Red Light Therapy for Reducing Fine Lines and Wrinkles

Written By Medford Sola

Benefits of Red Light Therapy for Reducing Fine Lines and Wrinkles

🔑 Key Points

  • Stimulates Collagen and Elastin Synthesis: Increases dermal protein production, improving skin elasticity and plumpness.

  • Reduces Wrinkle Volume ~30%: Clinical trials show significant reduction in periocular wrinkles after 10–12 RLT sessions.

  • Improves Dermal Density and Firmness: Long-term daily use increases dermal density by >60%, reducing sagging and pore size.

  • Minimizes Skin Redness and Inflammation: Anti-inflammatory effects help calm photoaging skin and prevent collagen breakdown.

  • Enhances Skin Texture and Pore Appearance: Regular RLT smooths skin, refines pores, and enhances overall texture.

  • Non-invasive with No Downtime: RLT is gentle, safe for all skin types, and free from downtime—ideal for maintenance routines.

  • Synergistic with Other Anti-Aging Treatments: Compliments microneedling, retinoids, and chemical peels with minimal irritation.

  • Visible Results in 4–12 Weeks: Users often report smoother, tighter skin within a few weeks of consistent use.

Introduction

As skin ages—due to natural processes and photoaging—it loses collagen and elastin, leading to fine lines, wrinkles, and sagging. Conventional treatments like laser resurfacing, chemical peels, and injectables can be effective but often involve downtime or side effects. Red light therapy (RLT), a form of photobiomodulation, uses 600–850 nm wavelengths to stimulate mitochondrial activity, increase collagen production, and reduce inflammation—offering a gentle, scientific approach to reversing age-related skin changes.

Red Light Therapy in Action

  1. Collagen & Elastin Synthesis: RLT stimulates fibroblasts, enhancing production of collagen types I/III and elastin, essential for youthful skin.

  2. Increased Dermal Density & Firmness: Clinical studies show >60% increase in dermal density and measurable improvements in skin tightness.

  3. Wrinkle Reduction: A randomized trial noted a 31.6% decrease in periocular wrinkle volume after 10 sessions (660 nm, 3.8 J/cm²).

  4. Anti-Inflammatory Effects: RLT lowers MMP expression and inflammatory cytokines, protecting collagen from degradation.

  5. Improved Skin Texture & Pore Size: Studies confirm reduction in pore size (~28%) and enhanced skin smoothness.

  6. Safe for All Skin Types: RLT is non-UV, low risk, and ideal for daily or routine use without downtime.

  7. Adjunct to Other Procedures: When combined with microneedling, retinoids, or peels, RLT enhances outcomes and speeds recovery.

  8. Rapid Results: Consistent use (2–5x/week) can yield visible improvements in 4–12 weeks.

Treatment Comparison Table

Conclusion

Red light therapy is a safe, validated option for reducing fine lines and wrinkles. With evidence demonstrating increased collagen/elastin, reduced wrinkle volume, firmer skin, and enhanced texture—all without downtime—it stands out as both a standalone and complementary treatment. For optimal results, consistent use 2–5 times weekly over 4–12 weeks is recommended, ideally in combination with other rejuvenating practices.

Scientific References

  1. Couturaud V, Le Fur M, Pelletier M, Granotier F. Reverse skin aging signs by red light photobiomodulation. Skin Res Technol. 2023;29:e13391.

  2. Baez F., and Reilly L.R. (2007). The use of light-emitting diode therapy in the treatment of photoaged skin. J. Cosmet. Dermatol. 6, 189–194

  3. Vinck E.M., Cagnie B.J., Cornelissen M.J., Declercq H.A., and Cambier D.C. (2003). Increased fibroblast proliferation induced by light emitting diode and low power laser irradiation. Lasers Med. Sci. 18, 95–99

  4. Mota LR, Duarte IDS, Galache TR, et al. Photobiomodulation reduces periocular wrinkle volume by 30%: a randomized controlled trial. Photobiomod Photomed Laser Surg. 2023;41(1):48–56.

  5. Zastrow L., Groth N., Klein F., et al. (2009). The missing link–light-induced (280–1,600 nm) free radical formation in human skin. Skin Pharmacol. Physiol. 22, 31–44

  6. Crisan D., Crisan M., Moldovan M., Lupsor M., and Badea R. (2012). Ultrasonographic assessment of the cutaneous changes induced by topical flavonoid therapy. Clin. Cosmet. Investig. Dermatol. 5, 7–13

  7. Jenkins PA. Response to: Photobiomodulation Reduces Periocular Wrinkle Volume by 30%. Photobiomod Photomed Laser Surg. 2023;41(6):304–305.

  8. Lee S.Y., Park K.H., Choi J.W., et al. (2007). A prospective, randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blinded, and split-face clinical study on LED phototherapy for skin rejuvenation: Clinical, profilometric, histologic, ultrastructural, and biochemical evaluations and comparison of three different treatment settings. J. Photochem. Photobiol. B. 88, 51–67

  9. Santana–Blank L., Rodríguez–Santana E., and Santana–Rodríguez K.E. (2012). Photobiomodulation of aqueous interfaces as selective rechargeable bio-batteries in complex diseases: personal view. Photomed. Laser Surg. 30, 242–249 [PubMed]

  10. Johnson L, et al. Low-level red and infrared light increases expression of collagen and elastin. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2019;80:1234–1242.

  11. Wunsch, A., & Matuschka, K. (2013). A controlled trial to determine the efficacy of Red and Near-Infrared Light treatment in patient satisfaction, reduction of fine lines, wrinkles, skin roughness, and intradermal collagen density increase. Photomedicine and Laser Surgery, 32(2), 93–100. https://doi.org/10.1089/pho.2013.3616

  12. Zhang Y., Song S., Fong C.C., et al. (2003). cDNA microarray analysis of gene expression profiles in human fibroblast cells irradiated with red light. J. Invest. Dermatol. 120, 849–857 [PubMed]

  13. Jang Y.H., Koo G.B., Kim J.Y., Kim Y.S., and Kim Y.C. (2013). Prolonged activation of ERK contributes to the photorejuvenation effect in photodynamic therapy in human dermal fibroblasts. J. Invest. Dermatol. 133, 2265–2275

  14. Sabreen A, et al. Efficacy of RLT for skin rejuvenation: controlled trial. Med (Baltim). 2023;102: e021419.

  15. Jagdeo J, et al. Safety of LED‑Red Light on Human Skin: Two RCTs. J Biophotonics. 2020;13(5):e201960014.

  16. Barolet D, et al. Regulation of skin collagen metabolism using pulsed 660 nm LED. J Invest Dermatol. 2009;129(7):1691–1699.

  17. Chung H., Dai T., Sharma S., Huang Y.Y., Carroll J., and Hamblin M. (2012). The nuts and bolts of low-level laser (light) therapy. Ann. Biomed. Eng. 40, 516–533 [PubMed]

  18. Anderson R.R., and Parrish J.A. (1981). The optics of human skin. J. Invest. Dermatol. 77, 13–19

  19. Gupta A.K., Filonenko N., Salansky N., and Sauder D.N. (1998). The use of low energy photon therapy (LEPT) in venous leg ulcers: a double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Dermatol. Surg. 24, 1383–1386

  20. Minatel D.G., Frade M.A., Franca S.C., and Enwemeka C.S. (2009). Phototherapy promotes healing of chronic diabetic leg ulcers that failed to respond to other therapies. Lasers Surg. Med. 41, 433–441 [DOI] [PubMed]

  21. Barolet D., Roberge C.J., Auger F.A., Boucher A., and Germain L. (2009). Regulation of skin collagen metabolism in vitro using a pulsed 660 nm LED light source: clinical correlation with a single-blinded study. J. Invest. Dermatol. 129, 2751–2759 [PubMed]

  22. Huang Y.Y., Chen A.C.H., Carroll J.D., and Hamblin M.R. (2009). Biphasic dose response in low level lightherapy. Dose Response 7, 358–383

  23. Calderhead R.G. (2007). The photobiological basics behind light-emitting diode (LED) phototherapy. Laser Ther. 16, 97–108

  24. Goldberg D.J., Amin S., Russell B.A., Phelps R., Kellett N., and Reilly L.A. (2006). Combined 633-nm and 830-nm led treatment of photoaging skin. J. Drugs Dermatol. 5, 748–753

  25. Giacomoni P.U., Mammone T., and Teri M. (2010). Gender-linked differences in human skin. J. Dermatol. Sci. 55, 144–149 [PubMed]

  26. Shoshani D., Markovitz E., Monsterey S.J., and Narins D.J. (2008). The Modified Fitzpatrick Wrinkle Scale: A clinical validated measurement tool for nasolabial wrinkle severity assessment. Dermatol. Surg. 34, 85–91

  27. Vinck E.M., Cagnie B.J., Cornelissen M.J., Declercq H.A., and Cambier D.C. (2005). Green light emitting diode irradiation enhances fibroblast growth impaired by high glucose level. Photomed. Laser Surg. 23, 167–171 [PubMed]

  28. Papadavid E., and Katsambas A. (2003). Lasers for facial rejuvenation: A review. Int. J. Dermatol. 42, 480–487

  29. Khoury J.G., and Goldman M.P. (2008). Use of light-emitting diode photomodulation to reduce erythema and discomfort after intense pulsed light treatment of photodamage. J. Cosmet. Dermatol. 7, 30–34 [PubMed]

  30. Smith K.C. (2005). Laser (and LED) therapy is phototherapy. Photomed. Laser Surg. 23, 78–80 [DOI] [PubMed]

  31. van Breugel H.H., and Bär P.R. (1992). Power density and exposure time of He-Ne laser irradiation are more important than total energy dose in photo-biomodulation of human fibroblasts in vitro. Lasers Surg. Med. 12, 528–537 [PubMed]

  32. Calderhead R.G., Kubota J., Trelles M.A., and Ohshiro T. (2008). One mechanism behind LED phototherapy for wound healing and skin rejuvenation: Key role of the mast cell. Laser Therapy 17, 141–148

  33. Webb C., Dyson M., and Lewis W.H. (1998). Stimulatory effect of 660 nm low level laser energy on hypertrophic scar-derived fibroblasts: possible mechanisms for increase in cell counts. Lasers Surg. Med. 22, 294–301 [PubMed]

  34. Karu T.I. (2010). Multiple roles of cytochrome c oxidase in mammalian cells under action of red and IR-A radiation. IUBMB Life 62, 607–610 [DOI]

  35. Weiss R.A., McDaniel D.H., Geronemus R.G., and Weiss M.A. (2005). Clinical trial of a novel non-thermal LED array for reversal of photoaging: clinical, histologic, and surface profilometric results. Lasers Surg. Med. 36, 85–91 [PubMed]

  36. Russell B.A., Kellett N., and Reilly L.R. (2005). A study to determine the efficacy of combination LED light therapy (633 nm and 830 nm) in facial skin rejuvenation. J. Cosmet. Laser Ther. 7, 196–200 [DOI] [PubMed]

  37. Sadick N.S. (2008). A study to determine the efficacy of a novel handheld light-emitting diode device in the treatment of photoaged skin. J. Cosmet. Dermatol. 7, 263–267

  38. Oh J.H., Kim Y.K., Jung J.Y., et al. (2011). Intrinsic aging- and photoaging-dependent level changes of glycosaminoglycans and their correlation with water content in human skin. J. Dermatol. Sci. 62, 192–201 [PubMed]

  39. Weiss RA, et al. Clinical experience with LED photomodulation. Dermatol Surg. 2005;31(9):1217–1224.

  40. Smith KC. Phototherapy with lasers and LEDs. Photomed Laser Surg. 2005;23(2):78–84.

  41. Hamblin MR, de Freitas LF. Proposed mechanisms of photobiomodulation. IEEE J Sel Top Quantum Electron. 2016;22(3):7000417.

  42. Finlayson L, et al. Depth penetration of light into skin as a function of wavelength. Photochem Photobiol. 2021;98(4):984–993.

Disclaimer: The Medford Red Light Therapy website is designed and intended for general informational purposes only and does not constitute the practice of medicine, nursing or other professional health care services, including the giving of medical advice, and no doctor/patient relationship is formed. The use of information on this website is at the user’s own risk.  Results may vary by individual.  The content of this website is not intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment. Users should not disregard or delay in obtaining medical advice for any medical condition they may have and should seek the assistance of their health care professionals for any such conditions.

Medford Sola
Previous

Red Light Therapy for Arthritis Pain Relief
Next

10 Ways Red Light Therapy Speeds Muscle Recovery